We learnt here that Ombudsman Rob Behrens was particularly miffed at the newly drafted legislation which left him outside the ‘safe space’ model used by the Health Services Safety Investigations Body .
Sir Bernard Jenkin, was instrumental in setting up the initial Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) in 2017 in response to a series of health scandals and lack of confidence in the PHSO investigation process. He made the following statement in 2016 as part of his call for legislation to make the new body independent of the NHS in what appears to be a genuine attempt to improve patient safety.
“Following Francis on MidStaffs, the Morecombe Bay inquiries, dissatisfaction with PHSO’s NHS investigation role, and the rest, HSIB will prove to be the biggest single step this government will make to change the culture of the NHS.
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/327/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/news/101759/healthcare-safety-investigation-branch-new-legislation-needed-to-make-effective/
The proposed Health and Care bill reinforces the importance of ‘independence’ stating that;
Independence as a concept is fundamentally important to HSSIB as it will be a crucial way of ensuring that patients, families and staff have trust in its processes and judgements.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-and-care-bill-factsheets/health-and-care-bill-health-services-safety-investigations-body
This rather suggests that existing systems, such as the Ombudsman, lack independence and consequently are not trusted by patients, families and staff.
Being shut out of the safe space zone wasn’t the only blow for Mr Behrens. He also found himself excluded from NHSE investigations into serious concerns at University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) Here he is on Newsnight (14th March 2023) going public on the matter.
This is an extraordinary act on the part of the Ombudsman, so close to his retirement (knighthood?) in March 2024. He casts serious doubt on the ability of NHS England to carry out clinical reviews.
In those early days, after we triggered our concerns, we were told by NHS England that we would be invited to participate into the second of the reviews and subsequently that invitation was withdrawn. And my concern is, a general concern, that the NHS is not good about commissioning independent reviews to make sure there’s proper learning from what has happened and I need to be reassured that in this case, that is not also the case. But I’m sceptical.
https://youtu.be/QKKvEtR8Ip0 4:35
The phrase ‘a general concern’ indicates that it is not specific to this investigation. That NHS England generally fails to carry out reviews that ensure proper learning. So why hasn’t he spoken out before?
He also draws attention to his own lack of power by hitting back via Newsnight. This serves to lift the veil of public confidence, which is always a dangerous option.
It must be particularly galling for Behrens to be frozen out of these reviews when it would appear that he was first to raise the alarm when he issued the Emerging Concerns Protocol in August 2022.
Although he was concerned about patient safety at UHB some seven months earlier, it wasn’t until March 2023 that the Ombudsman started to put statements into the public domain via the PHSO website. Those of us who have first-hand experience of the Ombudsman’s investigative services can only wince at the following statement.
Rob Behrens said: “I’m extremely disappointed that NHSE denied us the opportunity to contribute to its review. It’s hard to see how the review can be evidence based if it doesn’t consider all the evidence. It raises real concerns around the completeness and transparency of these reviews.
https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/news-and-blog/news/ombudsman-extremely-concerned-about-culture-university-hospitals-birmingham
The protocol allows professional organisations to share information that would otherwise be confidential but his offer of assistance was rejected. Angry and insulted he has become chief whistleblower.
In the Newsnight interview Behrens spoke about ‘examining hundreds of cases’ with an example of ‘avoidable deaths’ and stated that his primary concern was about the lack of cooperation and learning at UHB, where his draft findings were rejected leaving serious patient safety concerns. The following chart is an amalgamation of data provided on the PHSO website from 2019 – April 2022 for UHB. It does show that hundreds of complaints have been made to the Ombudsman, but only a fraction of them were investigated or upheld.

On the surface, this data does not indicate an NHS Trust in crisis. It would be helpful to examine some upheld cases to put his concerns into context. Investigation reports are published on the PHSO website, but not all cases are made public and there is a time lag in releasing completed cases. Here are two examples, accepting that there may be others that have not been identified due to limitations in the search function.
The recommendation in the first case is simply to pay compensation of £250 to Mrs O.
we recommend the Trust should pay Mrs O £250 in recognition of the distress she suffered due to not being given adequate support towards the end of her husband’s life.
Mrs O had complained about a lot more issues, such as her husband suffering paralysis from the waist down following radiotherapy to relieve cancer pain. She said that neither of them had been informed that this could be an outcome. It led to her husband losing his dignity and independence as well as increasing the pain. He caught Covid-19 while in the hospital and was discharged in April 2020 in a bad way and without oxygen. He was so poorly it was necessary to readmit him in the early hours. He died in hospital a week later. There are some serious concerns here but PHSO did not uphold any of these complaints. It is difficult to see why UHB would aggressively block such findings and refuse to cooperate when the Ombudsman could have determined far greater harm had been caused.
In the second example, Ms X complained about the care of her elderly mother Mrs X. She was in hospital between January 2019 and April 2019. In that time she suffered severe weight loss and loss of appetite. Although informed that her mother was partially sighted on admittance it took a second reminder in February for the Trust to take action and provide a ‘red tray’ indicating issues with feeding. She was not referred to the nutrition team until the 1st of March. The family complained that her weight was ‘estimated’ and not measured, that she was not provided with the nutritional supplement Fortisips and there was no review before her discharge to a community hospital. The mother also suffered from a pressure ulcer on her right heel which increased in severity due to lack of proper care. This caused reduced mobility and an increase in care costs following her return home.
An internal hospital investigation found the following;
On 6 February tissue viability staff carried out a root cause analysis (RCA) for the grade two pressure ulcer Mrs X had developed on her right heel. An RCA is a tool to help identify and address the root causes of an undesired outcome. The RCA report documents Mrs X had developed a grade two ulcer on her right heel and this had ‘deroofed’ (the external layer of skin was no longer in place). It noted there had been gaps when staff had not carried out skin inspections, that staff had not completed a pressure ulcer prevention plan, and staff had provided equipment to prevent a pressure ulcer too late. Following this, staff referred Mrs X to its podiatry team, and recommended providing absorbent dressings and pressure relief.
In this instance, PHSO recommended an action plan be drawn up and as a level 3 injustice, awarded a payment of £950 to Ms X in recognition of the impact on herself and her family.
These cases look like business as usual for PHSO, so what else was happening in August 2022 that could have prompted the unprecedented actions of the Ombudsman?
On 22nd August 2022 CQC issued two fixed penalty notices against UHB for failure to obtain consent from a patient who used sign language to communicate. The trust was fined £8,000 for three breaches. Then around the start of September 2022, Newsnight began an investigation into the trust following approaches from whistleblowers.

From the Youtube banner which was released on 15th March 2023.
Newsnight focussed its investigation on statements from doctors, governors and hospital insiders to reveal a toxic culture affecting patient safety. It was the first Newsnight report in December 2022 that triggered the launch of three NHS England reviews into the troubled trust. Without the forthcoming media investigation would the Ombudsman have triggered his Emerging Concerns Protocol? It is clear from the Newsnight reports that this scandal was years in the making, yet Behrens was silent in 2019/20 when the Ombudsman actually upheld the most complaints. Should he have spoken out sooner?
In June 2022, just three months before the Newsnight investigation started, two clinicians who worked at the Trust committed suicide. One left a suicide note citing the working environment at the Trust as the sole reason.
A junior doctor left a suicide note blaming her death entirely on the hospital where she worked.
Vaish Kumar, 35, who was based at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QE), said in the letter shared by her parents the working environment “just broke me”. She died in June and an inquest heard she told paramedics shortly before she died not to take her to the QE. The trust running the hospital said it needed to learn from her death. In the note to her mother, Dr Kumar said her mental health had declined while working at the QE and she was “now a nervous wreck”.
The letter, which the family tried unsuccessfully to submit as evidence on the day of the doctor’s inquest, ended: “I am sorry mum, I can blame the whole thing on the QEH.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-64333162
Another, an anesthetist, mysteriously disappeared.
Heartfelt tributes have flooded in for NHS and Army doctor Andrew Haldane, who went missing after leaving work at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital(QE). Police searching for missing Lt Col Haldane found a body in remote Worcestershire countryside yesterday (Wednesday, June 8).
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/tributes-flood-queen-elizabeth-hospital-24181938
The assumption is that he took his own life but the article did not mention a suicide note.
The most suspicious death occurred in August 2018 when a locum Eduard Zigar, from Lithuania, was found hanged in a cupboard at the hospital.
Dr Zigar’s parents travelled from Lithuania for the hearing. His mother, Julia Zigar, told the court her son was a “tolerant, loving person who loved life”. She said he texted her every day and was due to return home to Lithuania the week after he died. “He showed no signs of unhappiness and had never spoken of killing himself,” she said. “He was extremely religious and suicide is not acceptable in our religion.” Mrs Hunt recorded a conclusion of suicide.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/doctor-eduard-zigar-killed-himself-15581344
It is clear that junior doctor Vaish Kumar did not feel she could speak out in the ‘toxic, mafia-like’ environment and took her own life to draw attention to the crisis at the Trust. The young locum, however, due to return home, had nothing to lose from speaking out. What did Zigar witness in his short time at the hospital (less than one week) and what did he intend to do with that information? These deaths reveal a ruthless culture operating at the Trust and the death of Mr Zigar in particular, calls for a public inquiry.
The Ombudsman complains that he is being sidelined, but his investigative evidence does nothing to reveal the true horror at UHB. His increasingly low uphold rate (1.3% in 2021/22) has made him irrelevant in terms of patient safety, which is why we need a body such as HSSIB.

He has surely brought this on himself and collaboration with his International Ombudsman Institute (IOI) chums to put pressure on government will not have been well received. The more he moves in international circles, the more he is being frozen out in the UK.

Ombudsman Rob Behrens is “concerned”.
BBC:
“Norfolk and Suffolk NHS trust deaths report ‘watered down to spare bosses'”
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-norfolk-66086388
LikeLike
Never underestimate the vanity of the man.
LikeLike
UIN 194054, tabled on 13 July 2023
Mary Kelly Foy
‘To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an assessment of the adequacy of the performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman in resolving NHS complaints.’
Maria Caufield
‘Ministers do not assess any aspect of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s performance. The Ombudsman reports to Parliament directly and is held to account through the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, who hold an annual scrutiny session to evaluate his performance.’
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-07-13/194054
In other words, nothing to do with us. Once a year the Ombudsman and the Chief Executive come before a committee. The Ombudsman talks about the Venice Principles and if he is asked a difficult question says the Chief Executive will answer it.
LikeLike
Spot on Jeff. They don’t want to lift the lid on the toxic waste dump.
LikeLike
“And Rob Behrens began his journey by saying the previous ombudsman ‘lost her way’.”
I’m not sure if Rob Behrens has lost his way, but the way for millions of pensioners is towards a sinkhole:
LikeLike
The small proportion of NHS complaints that make it to the Ombudsman are likely to be very serious.
NHS complaint stats:
2020/21
‘All NHS Written Complaints: (Hospital and Community Health Services and Primary Care)
The total number of all reported written complaints in 2020-21 was 170,013.’
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/data-on-written-complaints-in-the-nhs/2020-21
2021/22
‘All NHS Written Complaints: (Hospital and Community Health Services and Primary Care)
The total number of all reported written complaints in 2021-22 was 225,570.’
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/data-on-written-complaints-in-the-nhs/2021-22
I think many complaints will concern physical harm resulting from misdiagnosis, wrong medicine, shoddy surgery etc.
But what I don’t understand is how these complaints could be partly upheld (maybe they never are). Harmed a little?
I suppose one can only judge after having read the full details of each case. If no one gets to read everything apart from the PHSO, then the Ombudsman’s decisions cannot be judged.
LikeLike
That’s why the Ombudsman likes to be the final adjudicator. That way, no one can say he got it wrong.
LikeLike
The only people with access to the full picture are PHSO staff and the complainants, generally.
Trustpilot, however, paints a damning picture of the Ombudsman:
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.ombudsman.org.uk
I can’t say that Rob Behrens will be leaving PHSO in a better position than he found it.
He made a big thing about mediation, but…
’25. He [Ombudsman Rob Behrens] also said the use of mediation would “more than double” over the next year, but was unable to say precisely to what level. However, it is worth noting that mediation makes up less than 0.1% of total number of cases reported in the Annual Report and Accounts (29 of 36,614).’
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/pacac_meeting_29_nov_2022_mediat#comment-111250
And he presided over perhaps the biggest data breach in PHSO history:
‘The names of just over 5,300 complainants and 197 members of PHSO staff were published.’
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/massive_data_breach_did_you_publ#comment-96699
And his Learning Academy hasn’t progressed as planned:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/phso_learning_academy_referred_t#comment-95346
And £2m spent on recruitment agencies in 2022 seems a lot.
Robert Walters who recruited 10 staff got £502,615.04:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/recruitment_agency_spend_of_ps12#incoming-2337033
His successor will have their work cut out.
LikeLike
And Rob Behrens began his journey by saying the previous ombudsman ‘lost her way’. No doubt his replacement will be suitable loquacious in praising both him and the rest of the hard working staff. It has become all so predictable. Sigh.
LikeLike
Some statistics.
One complaint was fully upheld. Hundreds went nowhere.
Complaints about the NHS in England 2020-21
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (p37)
Complaints received – 212
Complaints resolved through mediation – 0
Decided following primary investigation – 38
Resolved with agreement of the complainant at Initial checks or Primary Investigation – 3
Complaints accepted for Detailed Investigation – 7
Detailed Investigations fully upheld – 1
Detailed Investigations partly upheld – 7
Detailed Investigations not upheld – 4
Detailed Investigations Resolved with the agreement of the complainant – 0
Detailed Investigations discontinued – 0
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/complaints_about_the_nhs_in_engl#incoming-1905601
LikeLike
All complaints resolved at primary investigation stage are closed without uphold.
LikeLike
Like the Puya raimondii that blooms once a century, Quango heads and the like are known for their pre-gong spurts. In the case of the Ombudsman, however, any similarities may be purely coincidental. Sometimes the truth just takes a long time to come out and dedicated public servants need to be sure before they act.
A few days ago the Ombudsman identified a “culture of cover-up” in the NHS:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/nhs-government-b2366554.html
Again, one of those things that takes time to find out.
And he kicked off his regional roadshow tour in March:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/regional_road_show_in_stockton_o#comment-110871
A hard-working and dedicated public servant to the very end.
I note that in the Newsnight interview he didn’t say how many of the complaints he had received against the trust had been upheld. Mr Behrens will be long gone, and the Newsnight interview long-forgotten, before we find that out.
LikeLike
With just a 1.3% uphold for NHS complaints the Ombudsman has managed to cover up 98% of the issues. That’s why he gave his announcement to a room full of insiders whose salary reply upon maintaining a patient safety narrative. No difficult questions there.
LikeLike
Of the hundreds of complaints he has received about the Trust – full of evidence that raised his concerns – two or three will be upheld.
The last chance investigator for health service complaints is really the almost no chance investigator.
LikeLike
Then he has the gall to call out the cover up culture in the NHS when he is clearly part of the cover up. Not fooling anyone but those paid to be fooled
LikeLike
HSSIB? You don’t really believe they’re the answer, do you? If they are, I’d love to know the question.
LikeLike
HSSIB are not the answer to improving patient safety but they are a step in the right direction and a big improvement on PHSO Mr Anonymous.
LikeLike
Once again, outstanding…
Meanwhile, MP who’s changed his tune is still OK with the idea
of doctors ‘ working outside their NHS employment’
providing NHS records to the police as a ‘ civil and legal matter’
LikeLike
Thank you for writing this article. I would draw into sharp focus the Ombudsman’s whining about being ignored with the Government response to PACAC annual scrutiny of the Ombudsman (published on PACAC website 16th June 2023). Extracts as follows:
“The Government….consider that our system is effective in the context in which it operates, ensuring that effective internal complaints processes address issues without the need to involve ombudsman and that complainants have recourse to the independent ombudsman where necessary”
“While the effective operation of the ombudsman system is an important matter, the Government is not convinced that fundamental reform is a priority at the current time, nor that legislation is the answer to the many identified issues”.
So there we have it. The system is effective for Government but not for complainants and reform is not a priority. However, the same political party was proposing to introduce ‘reform’ back in 2016 and shelved it.
It is interesting to note that it was Lord True who responded by letter to PACAC following the 2020-21 review. The Government response to the 2021-22 review was anonymous. However, I have identified that the Government minister currently responsible for ‘sponsorship’ of PHSO is Baroness Neville-Rolfe. No wonder the parliamentarians we actually elect are not raising this scandal on the floor of the House of Commons.
We have to realise that nothing will change this side of a general election and a change of Government. However, that would not necessarily mean a different incoming Government would behave differently.
LikeLike
These are good points David. From his inquiry into PHSO Sir Bernard Jenkin understood that the Ombudsman could not be relied upon for patient safety – hence his work to set up HSSIB. He also understood that the Ombudsman is effectively controlled by the Cabinet Office who are happy to keep it neutered. See this Government response to the PACAC report ‘Time for a People’s Ombudsman.
” The Cabinet Office already has an overarching policy responsibility across government in relation to ombudsman issues in general and shares, with the Department of Health, a specific sponsorship role for the PHSO. It acts as the Ombudsman’s principal point of contact with government and maintains regular liaison arrangements with the Ombudsman both at official and Ministerial level. This relationship works well. It recognises and respects that the Parliamentary Ombudsman was set up by Parliament and is independent of Government.”
As you say, this arrangement works well for government but not for the public. It is unlikely to change no matter which party is in power. No government will ever put it place a truly independent body which has the power to hold it to account.
LikeLike
Thank you Della. Your graphic on this blog showing Mr. Behrens not being part of the process is very reminiscent of how he treated PHSO The Facts after meeting with us in October 2017. You will recall he blanked us after the meeting citing ‘serious and unfounded allegations’ by us against PHSO. For over six years he, his board of governors and his staff have steadfastly refused to state what he considered unfounded.
The current situation he finds himself in is something he, personally, inflicted on our group in 2017. I am quite surprised he is not congratulating those that are sidelining him.
LikeLike
It would appear Rob Behrens is still in attack mode. Looks like he is going out all guns blazing. No hint of hypocrisy from him.
LikeLike
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/nhs-government-b2366554.html
LikeLike
AS YOU ARE ONLY TOO WELL AWARE DELLA THE MAN AND INDEED THE CURRENT PARTY IN POWER ARE â¦â¦â¦â¦ NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE AND OVER THE PAST PERIOD IN POWER HAVE DRAGGED ALL PARTS OF OUR COUNTRY DOWN THROUGH UNDERFUNDING A GROSS INCOMPETENCE. TREVOR D. PECKHAM.
LikeLike
Indeed, PHSO is part of the problem and not the solution. The Ombudsman has continually allowed trusts such as UHB off the hook and so they take further risks undeterred by sanctions and public disquiet. In this case we know at least three clinicians have died and who knows how many patients have suffered. Rob Behrens should hang his head in shame for the harm he has caused to countless people.
LikeLike
The likelihood of any kind of accountability when it comes to NHS clinical negligence is next to zero especially when the Ombudsman, regulators & courts are involved. This is due to leaders, like Rob Behrens, prioritising their own self interests over patient safety and who will cover up at any cost.
When I raised a complaint with the PHSO, the NHS Trust’s CEO, Steve Trenchard, was mates with the Ombudsman’s MD, Mick Martin. They colluded to change the report from one that upheld my complaint into one that didn’t. Its open corruption: https://patientcomplaintdhcftdotcom.wordpress.com/
LikeLike
I’m sure that the findings in the two cases quoted here have been watered down by the trust who know that they can put pressure onto the Ombudsman to avoid sanctions for the most harmful behaviour. The Ombudsman is weak and will not risk judicial review proceedings against a public body with access to unlimited funds.
LikeLike
Thanks for this enlightening post. I too have wondered whether the attention of the Ombudsman has been captured by international affairs.
I marvel at how Mr Behrens can manage his diary – e.g. entertaining international figures. For example, this past week or so, I understand he was presenting gifts to Australian Ombudsman Field in Manchester. Over the past year he has flitted to Ukraine, to Northern Ireland and taken part in conferences with international bodies concerning migration of Ukrainians.
Some UK residents may feel that he is spreading himself thinly and that there is need for a strong grip on the standards in UK healthcare. The PHSO online website doesn’t explain this more diverse role so the public are perhaps confused.
Mr Behrens is feeling excluded- his TV interview which you have helpfully included shows he believes his input was neither wanted nor considered relevant.
If he is ignored by large sectors then the question must arise, how seriously are Trusts responding to PHSO requests for evidence for bread and butter cases?
Without Trusts ‘co-operation, how do we know if PHSO final decisions are robust.
In the PHSO podcasts he holds, I get the impression he prefers a safe guest (he even invites on members of his own staff) one who may be willing to help him out and likely to bolster his reputation. To my mind, this may point to weakness in a leader.
I recall we had PHSO staff member interview with Dale and then we had another with PHSO clinical adviser Tony Dysart. How can Mr Behrens expect honest criticism from a staff member on air. Tony pointed out, “there’s obviously been a change in the Ombudsman and the senior management team -…a very positive move for the organisation.” ‘ Considering Dame Julie Mellor was, I understand, obliged to step down for her poor judgement in appointing Mick Martin, her Deputy, without checks, any substitute might look better by comparison.
If he is ever short of a guest, why not ask a member of the public, say one he had to apologise after a damning PHSO review, to find out why after a decade they are still looking for elusive PHSO resolution.
If any reader is interested in Mr Behrens dealings in Ukraine see blog:-
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/a-blessing-of-ombuds-or-a-plague-of-provocateurs
LikeLike
Radio Ombudsman is just a PR stunt. The trick of being the Ombudsman is to do nothing to protect the public yet continually look busy doing just that.
LikeLike